Did you know that God the Father is on every page of the Bible?

He thinks Protestantism has come to be about Jesus only, but Hebrews says (Hebrews 2:3-4)

How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;  God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?

Hence the title of his sermon: GOD ALSO.  A sermon on the neglect of the Father in modern Christianity, by an ex-Oneness.

Advertisement

Five Major Problems With The Trinity

The best and most respectful refutation of Trinitarianism on youtube.

James White getting owned by Open Theist Bob Enyart

The cross-examination is particularly humorous. James White essentially denies the Incarnation and the Trinity in order to keep his false doctrine of determinism.

Catholic guy partially agrees with Dohse, yet also shows that Dohse contradicts himself

This Catholic guy’s “documentary” on the Protestant doctrine of forensic justification makes many of the same points as Paul Dohse over at Paul’s Passing Thoughts.  But I would like to see the two debating the points on which they disagree, because although Dohse says that Protestantism is a false gospel because it denies the rebirth and says righteousness is purely alien and outside of us, he nonetheless continues those very doctrines (denial of the new birth and separation of righteousness from us as something alien) by making a distinction or drawing a hard line between justification and sanctification (or as this guy terms it in his analogy, “locking them in different classrooms“). Pay particular attention to his diagram of the two classrooms with the fat red line dividing them, and compare it to Dohse’s constant alien righteousness diagram. (Notice also how 1 John 1:7-9 is the ultimate death nail to not only Piper’s but Dohse’s systems.)

Dohse’s alien righteousness diagram:

Dohse’s alien righteousness diagram:

Dohse attacks Calvinists/Protestants for believing what is found in this diagram, namely the separation of justification and sanctification, but he teaches the exact same thing. How can he justify that? (Pardon the pun)

See John Calvin: Gnostic Extraordinaire for an example of Dohse using this diagram and bashing Protestants for believing it; and see What Your Sanctification Says About Your Justification: Is Your Gospel True or False? for an example of him nonetheless teaching exactly the same thing!

This is the same as the Catholic guy’s “two classrooms” diagram, which perfectly diagrams Dohse’s separation of justification and sanctification. The only difference is the use of a man vs a classroom on either side.